Gatorade Fieldhouse latest

achristy profile image

Buy-In Strategies for In-Season Training

As fall sports begin and teams get into the thick of their in-season schedules—travel, competition, practices, etc.—it can be easy for strength and conditioning to fall by the wayside or for sessions to be canceled completely. While there are legitimate reasons to cancel or modify a session, such as late travel, overall fatigue, or a change in the competition schedule, strength and conditioning should still remain a consistent part of an athlete’s routine. I have seen both sides of the spectrum: teams that hardly train during the season and teams that consistently prioritize their training. In my experience, the best teams are the ones that maintain consistency with their training throughout the season. When I have worked with teams where canceling sessions start to become the norm, some strategies I have used to create buy-in include: Show the performance trends. Are we trending positively or negatively? This can be any type of performance metric you use. I have used force plate trends with both individuals and teams to show their performance and demonstrate how we are trending throughout the season. When athletes can see that their training is producing results, it can help reinforce the value of staying consistent. Look at injury trends. Are we seeing an increase or decrease in injuries? While there are obviously many factors that contribute to injuries, looking at injury trends can provide another piece of information when discussing the value of maintaining consistent training throughout the season. Maintain consistency. I think keeping an athlete’s schedule consistent during the season is critical, both physically and mentally. Of course, this can vary from sport to sport, but for simplicity’s sake, if a team lifts every Monday and Wednesday and those sessions suddenly get canceled, this can disrupt the rhythm and mindset of the athletes. Consistency helps make training part of the normal routine rather than something that can easily be pushed aside. It is ok to give autonomy. I like to provide athletes, especially high-playing-time athletes, with some autonomy during the season. This helps build trust and allows us to better account for the demands they are experiencing from practices and competitions. Autonomy does not necessarily mean changing the entire training session; it can be as simple as adjusting volume, exercise selection, or accessories based on how the athlete is feeling and what they have experienced that week. Communicating this approach with coaches also demonstrates that you understand the demands of the in-season schedule and are willing to adjust training accordingly rather than taking a one-size-fits-all approach. Maintain intensity while managing volume. The goal during the season is not to accumulate a large amount of training volume. I like to keep sessions efficient and effective while incorporating additional mobility when appropriate. Every sport is different, but I have typically found that 1–3 lifting sessions per week can work well depending on the competition schedule and athlete demands. I also try to remain relatively consistent with movement choices. Athletes are more likely to experience soreness when we introduce excessive volume or too much exercise variation. Keeping movements relatively consistent and managing volume can help athletes maintain strength and continue training without unnecessarily contributing to fatigue. Ultimately, I think in-season buy-in comes from showing athletes and coaches that strength and conditioning is there to support performance—not compete with it. When athletes understand that we are adjusting training based on their demands while still maintaining consistency, it becomes easier to get everyone invested in the process. I would love to hear from the community about this topic: What strategies have you used to create in-season buy-in for training? Especially when times get tough or a team is on a losing streak, what have you done to keep training high quality and maintain consistency?

1 Comments

12 hours ago

Oluayeni profile image

Recovery Under the Clock: Building a Hydration-First Culture in Professional Sports

When recovery time is limited, my top three priorities would be hydration, nutrition, and sleep. Hydration is something I’ve seen emphasized heavily during my time with the Cincinnati Bengals. It starts before practice or competition and continues throughout the day, rather than waiting until an athlete feels thirsty. Nutrition then helps replace the energy and nutrients used during competition and provides the building blocks needed for recovery. Finally, sleep gives the body and brain the opportunity to recover and prepare for the next performance. What I find interesting is that research doesn't necessarily support one “magic” recovery strategy. A 2022 systematic review of recovery methods in professional football examined 39 studies and found that the effectiveness of different recovery strategies varies depending on the outcome being measured. That makes the athletic trainer's role especially important: when time is limited, how do we determine which recovery strategies will provide the most benefit for that individual athlete? Question for the group: When you have a short recovery window between competitions, how do you individualize your priorities for hydration, nutrition, sleep, and other recovery strategies? Querido, S. M., Radaelli, R., Brito, J., Vaz, J. R., & Freitas, S. R. (2022). “Analysis of Recovery Methods’ Efficacy Applied up to 72 Hours Postmatch in Professional Football: A Systematic Review With Graded Recommendations.” https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35961644/

1 Comments

yesterday

vailskier3 profile image

Failure in Professional Sports

On 9/8/2026 at 2:42 PM, achristy said: I’d be curious to hear your thoughts on what you do when someone continues to make the same mistake. I absolutely believe mistakes are part of the process of learning and growing, but at what point does repeated failure become something that needs to be addressed differently? Thanks for the follow-up! I think having candid conversations around what is happening is my approach. If I repeatedly see someone making the same mistake, I usually just ask, "I've noticed this has happened a couple times, why do you think this is happening?" I try to let them feel out why they are having the problem in the first place. That usually draws out more open conversation around what is going on for them. Sometimes it is a lack of self-awareness. They don't even notice that it's happening. Then you can bring it to their attention and they will be able to recognize the pattern the next time it comes around. If they have the awareness and continue to make the same mistake, then my approach would be to set an expectation with a clear objective. Giving a hard line for them to not cross lets them know that it is an important piece of the puzzle. Best example would be a repeat soft tissue injury. You could say something like, "Our goal as a performance team is to not have re-injury after clearance for return-to-play. Let's do a case review and get everyone together to find out what we can do better as a group so this doesn't happen again in the future." Create the team support environment, and push people to help each other! We all have cross-disciplinary skills and can see from different views. I think that's a very undervalued insight.

4 Comments

11 days ago

rcampbellat profile image

Creatine Supplementation use in Basketball

This is something I see all the time in the collegiate setting. Creatine is probably one of the supplements my athletes ask me about the most, and honestly, it is one of the easier conversations to have because the evidence behind creatine monohydrate is so strong. With our basketball players, we tend to frame it around the demands of the sport. They are repeatedly sprinting, jumping, changing direction, and producing high levels of force throughout practices and games. Creatine isn't going to magically make someone a better basketball player, but it can help support the physiological demands that come with those activities and the strength and power adaptations we're trying to develop. What I also find interesting is the conversation around creatine and cognitive function. Collegiate athletes aren't just dealing with the physical demands of their sport. They're balancing practices, games, travel, classes, study hall, early mornings, late nights, and an incredibly long competitive schedule. For basketball in particular, the combination of travel and limited sleep can be significant. That's actually become one of the more effective ways I've found to talk about creatine adherence. Instead of simply telling an athlete, "Take this because it will help you get stronger," we can have a bigger conversation about supporting performance and recovery across the entire demands of being a college athlete. I also think it's important that we don't oversell the cognitive research. The performance benefits of creatine are well established; the brain and sleep-deprivation research is still developing. But I think it's an exciting area, especially when we're looking at the collegiate athlete as a whole person and not simply as an athlete in the weight room. From the athletic training side, I like that creatine is a relatively straightforward conversation: educate the athlete, make sure they're using a quality product, coordinate with sports nutrition and strength & conditioning, and make sure supplementation is part of a much bigger approach to nutrition, hydration, sleep, and recovery. Sometimes the biggest challenge isn't getting athletes to take something. It's getting them to understand why consistency matters.

3 Comments

9 months ago

Other member benefits

Development

Advance your knowledge through professional development opportunities.

Explore Courses
Performance

Help optimize the performance of your athletes.

Explore Resources
Collaboration

Find inspiration in the impact the community makes on and off the field.

SEE THE STORIES